[ Development  /  React Development ]

React that stays maintainable at scale.

Every React codebase is pleasant at ten components. The difference shows at two hundred, when state is spread everywhere and nobody can change a component without breaking three others.

Free code review · Works alongside your team · Fixed scope

Freecode review to start
TypeScriptmigration supported
Accessibleby default
Works withyour existing team

[ Symptoms ]

Signs the codebase is fighting you.

None of these need a rewrite. All of them get worse if left alone.

State scattered everywhere

Server data, form state and UI state all handled the same way, so nothing has one obvious home.

Re-renders on every keystroke

Whole page trees re-rendering because context is doing a job a state library should do.

Copy-pasted components

Six nearly identical variants of the same card, each with slightly different bugs.

Runtime type errors

No TypeScript, so shape mismatches are found by users instead of the compiler.

Long lists that stutter

Thousands of rows rendered at once, so scrolling drops frames on anything but a fast laptop.

Not keyboard accessible

Custom dropdowns and modals that mouse users never notice are broken, and everyone else does.

[ How it works ]

Review, fix, level up the team.

01  —  Week 1

Review

Component structure, state architecture, render performance, type safety and accessibility. You get a prioritized list of what to fix and what to leave alone.

02  —  Week 2+

Fix or build

Worked in normal pull requests against your repository, so your team reviews every change and nothing arrives as a surprise.

03  —  Handover

Document

Patterns written down so the conventions survive after I leave, rather than decaying back within two sprints.

[ What actually changes ]

What I work on.

Whether this is a new build or a rescue, the same set of decisions determines how the codebase feels a year from now.

Architecture

  • Component structure — composable pieces with clear boundaries, not props objects with thirty keys.
  • State separation — server state, form state and UI state each handled with the right tool.
  • Data fetching — caching, revalidation and error states handled once rather than per component.
  • TypeScript adoption — introduced incrementally to an existing codebase, not as a big-bang rewrite.
  • Design system integration — tokens and primitives so the interface stays visually consistent.

Quality

  • Render performance — profiled, then fixed where it matters, rather than memoizing everything on principle.
  • List virtualization — for the long lists and tables that make an app feel sluggish.
  • Accessibility — keyboard navigation, focus management and screen reader semantics.
  • Component tests — around behavior users depend on, not snapshots of markup.
  • Bundle size — measured per route, with heavy dependencies loaded only where needed.

[ Example engagement ]

Dashboard that stopped stuttering.

An internal analytics dashboard re-rendering the entire page on every filter change, with a ten-thousand-row table rendered in full.

Illustrative example of a typical engagement. Figures vary with the state of your systems and are not a guarantee of a specific outcome.

94%fewer re-renders
60fpsscrolling restored
46%smaller main bundle
0components rewritten

[ Free · no obligation ]

Get a code review first.

Give me read access to the repository. You get a written review of architecture, performance and accessibility, with fixes ranked by value per hour.

Request the review

[ Pricing ]

Pricing that fits your budget.

Tell me the number you have to work with. I'll tell you honestly what's achievable within it — and if it isn't enough, I'll say so before we start rather than halfway through.

Fixed project price

Scope agreed in writing, price agreed in writing, before any work starts. No hourly creep and no invoice you haven't already approved.

Monthly retainer

For ongoing work — maintenance, monitoring, updates and small changes. Month to month, cancel whenever, no minimum term.

Hourly for small jobs

For a single bug or a short task where writing a full scope would cost more than simply doing the work.

Budget too tight for the whole thing? I'll often suggest doing the highest-value part first and the rest later, rather than doing all of it badly.

[ Questions ]

Common questions.

Can you join an existing team?

Yes. I work in your repository, follow your conventions, and submit pull requests for review like any other team member.

Should we migrate to TypeScript?

For anything you will maintain beyond a few months, yes — and it can be adopted file by file rather than all at once, so the migration never blocks feature work.

Do we need a state management library?

Often less than people think. Separating server data from UI state removes most of the complexity, and what remains is usually small enough for built-in tools.

Can you do the design too?

I can build a clean, consistent interface from a reasonable brief, and I care about accessibility and visual detail. For serious brand or product design work, a dedicated designer will beat me.

React Native as well?

Web React is my focus. I can advise on sharing logic between web and mobile, but for a substantial React Native build you want a mobile specialist.

[ Let's talk ]

Tell me what you're building.

Describe it in a few lines and you'll get a straight answer on scope, cost and timeline โ€” same working day, from the person who'd actually build it.