Deploys take an hour
A manual sequence of SSH commands, file uploads and cache clears, performed slightly differently each time.
[ Servers & DevOps / CI/CD & GitHub Actions ]
If shipping requires a checklist, a spare hour and someone's nerve, you ship less often and each release carries more risk. A proper pipeline turns deployment into a merge, and rollback into one click.
Usually 1-2 weeks · Works with your existing stack · Fixed price
[ Symptoms ]
Deployment friction is invisible on a roadmap and expensive everywhere else.
A manual sequence of SSH commands, file uploads and cache clears, performed slightly differently each time.
The deploy process lives in one engineer's head, so releases stop when they are away.
When a release breaks production, the only option is to fix forward under pressure.
A test suite that exists but is not enforced, so broken code reaches main regularly.
Production credentials committed to git because there was nowhere better to put them.
Different versions, different config, so passing on staging proves very little.
[ How it works ]
Branching model, environments, what gates a merge, how secrets are stored and what rollback should look like for your stack. Agreed before any workflow is written.
Workflows written into your repository: build, test, artefact, deploy to staging, promote to production, roll back. Reviewed as a normal pull request.
We deploy live, break something on purpose, and roll it back together so your team has done it once before they need to do it for real.
[ What actually changes ]
Built with GitHub Actions by default. GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines and self-hosted runners are all fine alternatives if that is where your code lives.
[ Example engagement ]
A team deploying by hand roughly once a fortnight, moved to automated pipelines with staging promotion and a tested rollback path.
Illustrative example of a typical engagement. Figures vary with the state of your systems and are not a guarantee of a specific outcome.
[ Free · 45 minutes ]
Walk me through your current release process and I will tell you what I would automate first, what it would cost, and what it would save you per month.
[ Pricing ]
Tell me the number you have to work with. I'll tell you honestly what's achievable within it — and if it isn't enough, I'll say so before we start rather than halfway through.
Scope agreed in writing, price agreed in writing, before any work starts. No hourly creep and no invoice you haven't already approved.
For ongoing work — maintenance, monitoring, updates and small changes. Month to month, cancel whenever, no minimum term.
For a single bug or a short task where writing a full scope would cost more than simply doing the work.
Budget too tight for the whole thing? I'll often suggest doing the highest-value part first and the rest later, rather than doing all of it badly.
[ Questions ]
Yes. Pipelines are stack-agnostic — PHP, Node, Python, Go, static sites, containers or plain file deployments to a VPS. The steps change; the structure does not.
Absolutely, and it is often the thing that makes writing tests worthwhile. Automated deploys with rollback deliver value immediately, and once the pipeline exists, adding a test gate later is trivial.
Public repositories get free minutes. Private ones include a monthly allowance that most small teams stay within. If your builds are heavy, a self-hosted runner is cheap and I can set that up instead.
Yes. Moving from Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis or a hand-rolled script to GitHub Actions is common work, and I will keep the pipelines running in parallel until the new one is trusted.
Fully supported — containers, serverless functions, static hosting or plain instances, using short-lived credentials rather than long-lived access keys stored as secrets.
[ Related services ]
[ Let's talk ]
Describe it in a few lines and you'll get a straight answer on scope, cost and timeline — same working day, from the person who'd actually build it.