Confident wrong answers
No grounding, so the model fills gaps with fluent invention and users cannot tell the difference.
[ AI & Automation / AI RAG Chatbot ]
Retrieval-augmented generation means the assistant looks things up in your content before answering, and shows you where each answer came from. Done properly it is genuinely useful. Done badly it invents policies you never wrote.
Evaluated before launch · Citations on every answer · Fixed scope
[ Why most fail ]
The gap between a convincing demo and something staff will actually rely on is almost entirely in these six areas.
No grounding, so the model fills gaps with fluent invention and users cannot tell the difference.
Documents chunked badly, so the passage that actually answers the question is never retrieved.
Indexed once at launch and never refreshed, so answers slowly drift out of date.
Internal documents surfaced to anyone who asks the right question.
Token spend scaling with usage in a way nobody projected before launch.
No test set, so nobody can tell whether a prompt change made the assistant better or worse.
[ How it works ]
Which questions it must answer, from which sources, for which users. We write a real test set of questions and correct answers first — that is what makes evaluation possible later.
Ingestion, chunking, embedding and retrieval tuned against your content, with citations and refusal behavior built in from the start.
Scored against the test set, tuned, then deployed with logging so you can see what people actually ask and where it falls short.
[ What actually changes ]
The retrieval layer matters more than the model. Most quality problems are retrieval problems wearing a costume.
[ Example engagement ]
A help center assistant grounded in existing documentation, with citations and a strict refusal rule. Evaluated against 200 real historical support questions before launch.
Illustrative example of a typical engagement. Figures vary with the state of your systems and are not a guarantee of a specific outcome.
[ Free · no obligation ]
Tell me what you want the assistant to answer and where that knowledge lives today. You get an honest assessment of feasibility, cost and what it would take.
[ Pricing ]
Tell me the number you have to work with. I'll tell you honestly what's achievable within it — and if it isn't enough, I'll say so before we start rather than halfway through.
Scope agreed in writing, price agreed in writing, before any work starts. No hourly creep and no invoice you haven't already approved.
For ongoing work — maintenance, monitoring, updates and small changes. Month to month, cancel whenever, no minimum term.
For a single bug or a short task where writing a full scope would cost more than simply doing the work.
Budget too tight for the whole thing? I'll often suggest doing the highest-value part first and the rest later, rather than doing all of it badly.
[ Questions ]
Whichever fits your accuracy, latency, privacy and budget requirements — and the architecture is built so the model can be swapped later without a rewrite, because this field moves quickly.
No. Retrieval-augmented generation looks your content up at query time; nothing is trained on it. Where data residency matters, providers offer options that keep processing within a given region, and I will configure that explicitly.
Ongoing cost is mostly per-query token spend, which is modeled from your expected volume before you commit. Per-conversation limits and caching keep it predictable.
Then the assistant will be bad, and I will tell you that before taking the project. Retrieval cannot invent information that was never written down. Sometimes the honest first step is fixing the documentation.
Yes — booking, lookups, ticket creation and similar actions. Anything that changes data gets confirmation steps and permission checks, because a wrong answer is annoying and a wrong action is expensive.
The evaluation test set gives you a score before launch, and query logging shows what people actually ask afterwards. Both matter, and the second one usually produces the improvement backlog.
[ Related services ]
[ Let's talk ]
Describe it in a few lines and you'll get a straight answer on scope, cost and timeline — same working day, from the person who'd actually build it.