Several versions behind
Stuck on an old release, so security patches have stopped and every dependency upgrade now conflicts.
[ Development / Angular Development ]
Angular is built for large teams and long-lived applications, and it punishes neglect harder than most frameworks. Skipped versions and tangled reactive code are the two things that turn a solid app into one nobody wants to touch.
Free assessment · Incremental upgrades · Fixed scope
[ Symptoms ]
Usually the result of a team shipping features hard for two years without a maintenance budget.
Stuck on an old release, so security patches have stopped and every dependency upgrade now conflicts.
Manual subscriptions never unsubscribed, causing memory leaks and updates firing long after a component is gone.
The whole tree checked on every event, so the interface lags on anything but a fast machine.
Everything declared in a single module, so the initial bundle contains the entire application.
Dependencies constructed inline instead of injected, so nothing can be tested in isolation.
Three generations of Angular style in one codebase, so new developers cannot tell which is current.
[ How it works ]
Version gap, dependency conflicts, module structure, reactive patterns and test coverage. You get an upgrade path with the risk and effort at each step.
Upgraded one version at a time with tests in between, standalone components and lazy routes introduced where they earn their keep.
Conventions written down and walked through with your team so the codebase does not drift back within two quarters.
[ What actually changes ]
Upgrades come first, because everything else is harder to justify on a version that no longer receives security patches.
[ Example engagement ]
An internal enterprise application stuck on an unsupported Angular release with a single monolithic module. Upgraded incrementally with characterization tests written first.
Illustrative example of a typical engagement. Figures vary with the state of your systems and are not a guarantee of a specific outcome.
[ Free · no obligation ]
I assess your version gap, dependency conflicts and structure, then send back a realistic upgrade path with effort and risk at each step.
[ Pricing ]
Tell me the number you have to work with. I'll tell you honestly what's achievable within it — and if it isn't enough, I'll say so before we start rather than halfway through.
Scope agreed in writing, price agreed in writing, before any work starts. No hourly creep and no invoice you haven't already approved.
For ongoing work — maintenance, monitoring, updates and small changes. Month to month, cancel whenever, no minimum term.
For a single bug or a short task where writing a full scope would cost more than simply doing the work.
Budget too tight for the whole thing? I'll often suggest doing the highest-value part first and the rest later, rather than doing all of it badly.
[ Questions ]
Usually yes. Upgrades go one major version at a time on short-lived branches, so your team keeps shipping. That is slower than a freeze but far less disruptive to the business.
Rarely worth it for a working Angular application. A rewrite costs months and buys you no features. Modernizing what you have is almost always the better return, and I will tell you if yours is the exception.
The legacy version is long past end of life. I can help plan a migration to modern Angular or another framework, but I would not recommend investing further in AngularJS itself.
Yes, and that is usually the best arrangement — your developers know the domain, I bring the upgrade and architecture experience, and the knowledge stays with you.
Server-side rendering is worth it when you need SEO or fast first paint on public pages. For an internal application behind a login, it usually adds complexity for no benefit.
[ Related services ]
[ Let's talk ]
Describe it in a few lines and you'll get a straight answer on scope, cost and timeline โ same working day, from the person who'd actually build it.