Blocked event loop
Synchronous work in a request handler, so one heavy operation stalls every other request on the process.
[ Development / Node.js Development ]
Node makes it easy to ship an API in an afternoon and easy to block the event loop without noticing. I build the version that survives its first traffic spike and tells you clearly what broke when something does.
TypeScript by default · Tests included · Fixed scope
[ What goes wrong ]
Rarely dramatically. Usually a slow degradation nobody can explain from the outside.
Synchronous work in a request handler, so one heavy operation stalls every other request on the process.
A leak that forces a restart every few days, managed with a scheduled reboot instead of a fix.
Errors swallowed silently, so failures show up as missing data rather than alerts.
Database connections opened per request until the database refuses new ones.
Untrusted input reaching business logic, which is both a bug source and a security problem.
Unstructured console output, so diagnosing an incident means reading text by eye.
[ How it works ]
What the service does, expected load, what it talks to and who runs it afterwards. Written scope and fixed price before code.
Typed, tested and instrumented from the start, shipped in reviewable pull requests to a staging environment.
Containerized, deployed through a pipeline, with health checks, metrics and alerts wired up before real traffic arrives.
[ What actually changes ]
The difference between a prototype and a production service is almost entirely in the second column.
[ Example engagement ]
An API restarted every night by cron to clear a memory leak nobody had traced. Profiled under production-like load and fixed in a single change.
Illustrative example of a typical engagement. Figures vary with the state of your systems and are not a guarantee of a specific outcome.
[ Free · no obligation ]
Describe the symptom — memory growth, latency spikes, mystery restarts. You get an initial assessment and a fixed price to fix it properly.
[ Pricing ]
Tell me the number you have to work with. I'll tell you honestly what's achievable within it — and if it isn't enough, I'll say so before we start rather than halfway through.
Scope agreed in writing, price agreed in writing, before any work starts. No hourly creep and no invoice you haven't already approved.
For ongoing work — maintenance, monitoring, updates and small changes. Month to month, cancel whenever, no minimum term.
For a single bug or a short task where writing a full scope would cost more than simply doing the work.
Budget too tight for the whole thing? I'll often suggest doing the highest-value part first and the rest later, rather than doing all of it badly.
[ Questions ]
Whatever fits and whatever you already have. For new services I lean toward small, well-understood frameworks over large ones, because the framework is rarely the interesting part of the problem.
TypeScript for anything with a lifespan beyond a prototype. The cost is a little friction up front; the benefit is entire categories of runtime error that simply stop happening.
Yes, and production diagnosis is a good part of this work — memory leaks, event-loop stalls, latency spikes and mystery restarts.
Node suits real-time features and teams already writing TypeScript on the front end. Python suits data and machine learning work. Both are fine choices, and I build in either.
Yes. Since I do the infrastructure side too, the service and its runtime environment get designed together rather than handed over separately.
[ Related services ]
[ Let's talk ]
Describe it in a few lines and you'll get a straight answer on scope, cost and timeline โ same working day, from the person who'd actually build it.